Skip to main content

Were humans originally fruitarian?



Green Health Watch subscriber David Ryde was once recognised as the UK’s least-prescribing GP. His studies and experience had led him to advising changes in diet rather than dishing out drugs. In this article we summarise what convinced David that:
  • humans were probably originally vegan, even fruitarian
  • contemporary levels of meat-eating may be a factor in many diseases. Microscopic marks found on both the teeth of living species and on fossil teeth indicate that the humans of four million years ago (Australopithecus robusus) were fruitarians rather than omnivores, like present day chimpanzees
Although the move from veganism to omnivore happened over millions of years, it may still have outstripped the ongoing evolution of the human digestive system, he suggests, causing many of the illnesses from which we suffer today.


David's evidence

David’s evidence includes:
  • The human stomach needs half as much hydrochloric acid to digest plant protein as it needs to digest animal protein. Even using half as much hydrochloric acid the human stomach digests plant protein in half the time.1 This may explain why newly-converted vegetarians often note less discomfort digesting a vegetarian meal, and feeling less sleepy than after eating an omnivore meal
  • Humans are unlikely to have been naturally omnivorous. Most animals eat a narrow range of food when that food is abundant, only eating outside that range if it becomes scarce. This suggests that omnivore diets are more of a fall-back position than the norm
  • From around 24 million to 5 million years ago fruit appears to have been the main (possibly the only) ingredient in the human diet. Humans appear to have begun to include small amounts of (raw) meat around 4.5 million years ago.2 When an ice age and drought turned humans from gatherers to hunter-gatherers during the Pliocene period (3.5 million years ago), the raw meat content of the human diet likely increased.
  • However, as meat is almost universally cooked in order to make it more palatable and easier to digest, it is unlikely that a great deal of meat was eaten before humans learned how to light and control fire (around 500,000 years ago)
  • Natural carnivores have sharp molars like scissors which tear and cut meat vertically. The meat only begins to digest in the stomach. On the other hand, natural herbivores have flatter molars which both swing vertically to tear and swing sideways to crush. Herbivore digestion starts in the mouth.
Human teeth resemble those of the primates which eat principally fruit and vegetables
  • In herbivores the length of the bowel is usually around fifteen times the length of the trunk. In carnivores the usual proportion is around threefold
The length of the human bowel is typically ten times the length of the trunk, suggesting that humans are nearer herbivores than carnivores
  • The appendix is the shrunken remains of a herbivorous bowel and found almost exclusively in the higher primates, rodents and a few lower mammals
  • The DNA differences between gorillas, chimpanzees and humans are less than 1%,3 less than the differences between species of horses
  • At a glance it is easy to mistake a gorilla digestive tract for a human one, suggesting that human and gorilla digestive systems may function in a similar way
  • The lighter the primate, the higher the meat content of their diet.4 The diet of the smallest primate studied (65g) was 70% meat. The diets of the two largest primates studied, the orang-utan and the gorilla, were 2% and 1% carnivorous respectively. Average human weights fall between the two
  • Vegetarians and vegans tend to be slimmer and live a little longer than meat-eaters. They also suffer from fewer digestive tract and degenerative diseases and are less prone to gallstones, kidney stones, late onset type 2 diabetes and stomach complaints. Walker and Cannon5 also attributed (e.g.) colon cancer, hypertension, strokes, heart disease, diverticulosis (small pouches or sacs branching out from an organ, usually the large intestine) tooth decay, piles, peptic ulcers and varicose veins to the 20th Century diet

References

1 Lucas,J. Vegetarian Nutrition, p40. The Vegetarian Society 1979
2 Boyd,ES and Konner,M. Paleolithic Nutrition. New England Journal of Medicine 1985;312:283-89
3 Gribbin,J and Cherfas,J. The Monkey Puzzle p15-31, 128-31, 182. Paladin Books, London 1982
4 Hamilton,WJ III and Busse,C. Bio Science 1978;28:761-66
5 Walker,C and Cannon,G. The Food Scandal (quoting from the NACNE Report). Century Publishing, London 1985

(14423)  Nick Anderson. Green Health Watch Magazine   (8.10.2009)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OsteoTrace

OsteoTrace is one of my favourite dietary supplements. I take two tablets a day (with food) to help stop my osteoporosis getting worse, and with the aim of preventing arthritis developing. Most people take it for their arthritis and arthritis pain. OsteoTrace is the mix of minerals and vitamins developed by Dr. Rex Newnham to treat (successfully) his own worsening arthritis. Principal amongst the minerals is boron, following Rex's observation that the lower the levels of boron in the soil and water of an area, the higher the levels of arthritis in the people living in that area. Each tablet of OsteoTrace contains three milligrams of boron (in the form sodium tetraborate), so three tablets a day taken with food (the therapeutic dosage recommended by Rex) keeps you at the Optimum Daily Allowance (ODA) of nine milligrams and well below the Safe Upper Limit/Tolerable Upper Intake Level (SUL/TUIL) of 20 milligrams a day. The other fifteen nutrients in OsteoTrace were chosen specific

The 18.8.2018 Newsletter

  Green Health Watch Magazine published its new free newsletter last week .  It was a bumper edition (20 articles) because I wanted to give readers a representative mix of all of the magazine's principal interests - Children’s health   Diet   Energy sources   Fertility  Vaccination   Pesticides   GM crops   Chemical pollution   Illnesses of our time   Radiation   Climate change   Lifestyle   Complementary medicine   Food production   Orthodox medicine   Transport So. Here's an inaugatory treat for you. If you would like to be emailed future editions (probably monthly)  complete the following 'letter' and send it to me at: nick@greenhealthwatch.com Dear Nick Please include this email address ............................ in the email address list for your free Green Health Watch Magazine until further notice. My full name is …………………….. My full post code is …….. …... Please send me my newsletter (specify)          as a PDF   O

How long will shale gas keep our gas flowing?

A dozen or so hydraulic fracking companies have been granted licences to mine parts of the Bowland-Hodder shale deposits between one and three miles beneath the English Midlands. Two of these - iGas and Cuadrilla - have both recently raised their estimates of the volume of gas trapped in the shale they have been licensed to mine (often called 'gas-in-place'), They now believe it to be around 170 trillion* cubic feet (tcf) and around 200tcf respectively. These estimates correspond approximately to the recent 'most optimistic' gas-in-place estimates for the whole of the Bowland-Hodder shales (as opposed to just iGas's and Cuadrilla's shares) published by the British Geological Survey (BGS). For fun then, if iGas and Cuadrilla were indeed sitting on 370tcf of gas-in-place, and that was the UK's sole source of gas, how much gas might they eventually pump out profitably and, how long would it keep the country's gas grid flowing?  When assessing