Skip to main content

Shale gas explained

Shale gas is usually extracted using a technique called ‘hydraulic fracking’, or ‘fracking’, for short).


Drills bore down into the shale deposit (anything from 300 metres/
0.2 miles to 4.8km/3 miles beneath the surface), then (usually) horizontally into the shale deposit as far as they can. The horizontal bores are strengthened with concrete linings. Long metal cylinders (called ‘guns’) containing bullet-like explosive devices (called ‘shape charges’) are inserted into the (usually) horizontal bores. When everything is in place, the shape charges are triggered:

  • perforating the guns’ walls and the concrete linings of the bore along the guns’ lengths
  • sending jets of metal atoms through the newly-created perforations, fracturing and ‘melting’ the shale (such is the heat), and releasing the gas trapped in the shale
When the dust has settled, as it were, millions of gallons of water containing a large range of acids and (sometimes) toxic chemicals (for various reasons) are pumped down the vertical and horizontal bores and into the fractured shale beds at extremely high pressure (350-700 bars/atmospheres) to displace and bring to the surface 
the newly released gas.

Extracting shale gas is much more difficult and expensive than extracting gas from subterranean reservoirs (the conventional practice) and would not have been commercially viable (i.e. profitable) had not the world prices of oil risen so high. The high world prices for gas demonstrate either that:
  • the people controlling gas prices have decided to maximise their profits, or
  • world reserves of ‘reservoir’ gas are running out
Fracking is a dirty, polluting, resource-exhausting, health-threatening business. It pollutes the workplace and surrounding environment (particularly the sources of water) with toxic chemical and often radioactive waste (see ‘Radioactive pollution from fracking’ (Green Health Watch Magazine 45 page 19), and it consumes a huge amount of water (of major concern in these times of dwindling clean water sources).

(16425)  Nick Anderson. Green Health Watch Magazine 45:9 (6.8.2013)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OsteoTrace

OsteoTrace is one of my favourite dietary supplements. I take two tablets a day (with food) to help stop my osteoporosis getting worse, and with the aim of preventing arthritis developing. Most people take it for their arthritis and arthritis pain. OsteoTrace is the mix of minerals and vitamins developed by Dr. Rex Newnham to treat (successfully) his own worsening arthritis. Principal amongst the minerals is boron, following Rex's observation that the lower the levels of boron in the soil and water of an area, the higher the levels of arthritis in the people living in that area. Each tablet of OsteoTrace contains three milligrams of boron (in the form sodium tetraborate), so three tablets a day taken with food (the therapeutic dosage recommended by Rex) keeps you at the Optimum Daily Allowance (ODA) of nine milligrams and well below the Safe Upper Limit/Tolerable Upper Intake Level (SUL/TUIL) of 20 milligrams a day. The other fifteen nutrients in OsteoTrace were chosen specific

The 18.8.2018 Newsletter

  Green Health Watch Magazine published its new free newsletter last week .  It was a bumper edition (20 articles) because I wanted to give readers a representative mix of all of the magazine's principal interests - Children’s health   Diet   Energy sources   Fertility  Vaccination   Pesticides   GM crops   Chemical pollution   Illnesses of our time   Radiation   Climate change   Lifestyle   Complementary medicine   Food production   Orthodox medicine   Transport So. Here's an inaugatory treat for you. If you would like to be emailed future editions (probably monthly)  complete the following 'letter' and send it to me at: nick@greenhealthwatch.com Dear Nick Please include this email address ............................ in the email address list for your free Green Health Watch Magazine until further notice. My full name is …………………….. My full post code is …….. …... Please send me my newsletter (specify)          as a PDF   O

How long will shale gas keep our gas flowing?

A dozen or so hydraulic fracking companies have been granted licences to mine parts of the Bowland-Hodder shale deposits between one and three miles beneath the English Midlands. Two of these - iGas and Cuadrilla - have both recently raised their estimates of the volume of gas trapped in the shale they have been licensed to mine (often called 'gas-in-place'), They now believe it to be around 170 trillion* cubic feet (tcf) and around 200tcf respectively. These estimates correspond approximately to the recent 'most optimistic' gas-in-place estimates for the whole of the Bowland-Hodder shales (as opposed to just iGas's and Cuadrilla's shares) published by the British Geological Survey (BGS). For fun then, if iGas and Cuadrilla were indeed sitting on 370tcf of gas-in-place, and that was the UK's sole source of gas, how much gas might they eventually pump out profitably and, how long would it keep the country's gas grid flowing?  When assessing