Skip to main content

Shale gas explained

Shale gas is usually extracted using a technique called ‘hydraulic fracking’, or ‘fracking’, for short).


Drills bore down into the shale deposit (anything from 300 metres/
0.2 miles to 4.8km/3 miles beneath the surface), then (usually) horizontally into the shale deposit as far as they can. The horizontal bores are strengthened with concrete linings. Long metal cylinders (called ‘guns’) containing bullet-like explosive devices (called ‘shape charges’) are inserted into the (usually) horizontal bores. When everything is in place, the shape charges are triggered:

  • perforating the guns’ walls and the concrete linings of the bore along the guns’ lengths
  • sending jets of metal atoms through the newly-created perforations, fracturing and ‘melting’ the shale (such is the heat), and releasing the gas trapped in the shale
When the dust has settled, as it were, millions of gallons of water containing a large range of acids and (sometimes) toxic chemicals (for various reasons) are pumped down the vertical and horizontal bores and into the fractured shale beds at extremely high pressure (350-700 bars/atmospheres) to displace and bring to the surface 
the newly released gas.

Extracting shale gas is much more difficult and expensive than extracting gas from subterranean reservoirs (the conventional practice) and would not have been commercially viable (i.e. profitable) had not the world prices of oil risen so high. The high world prices for gas demonstrate either that:
  • the people controlling gas prices have decided to maximise their profits, or
  • world reserves of ‘reservoir’ gas are running out
Fracking is a dirty, polluting, resource-exhausting, health-threatening business. It pollutes the workplace and surrounding environment (particularly the sources of water) with toxic chemical and often radioactive waste (see ‘Radioactive pollution from fracking’ (Green Health Watch Magazine 45 page 19), and it consumes a huge amount of water (of major concern in these times of dwindling clean water sources).

(16425)  Nick Anderson. Green Health Watch Magazine 45:9 (6.8.2013)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Essential fatty acids reduced carbohydrate cravings

In 2005 Dr. Stephen Cavallino persuaded ten of his 'carbohydrate addict', overweight patients (eight females, two males) to: „     put themselves onto a higher-protein, lower carbohydrate diet for eight-weeks „     add a 'triply essential' fatty acid omega-6:omega-3 ~2:1 daily dietary supplement for the second four-weeks of the trial (2,900 milligrams daily, as provided by LINKYES Ultimate EFAs) „     assess themselves before starting the higher-protein, lower carbohydrate diet, then keep a daily log of their experience, particularly with regard to:     „     appetite    „     carbohydrate craving     „     weight reduction     „     general energy     „     general alertness Analysis of the logs justified the following conclusions: „     Adopting a higher-protein, lower carb...

Five-a-day? Ten? Lucky thirteen?

It is generally accepted that: eating a 200g (gram) mix of vegetables and fruit (V&F) a day (two and a half 80g portions) reduces one's risk of: developing heart disease by 16% having a stroke by 18% developing cardiovascular disease by 13% developing cancer by 4% and succumbing to premature death by any cause by 15% eating a 400g mix of V&F a day (the UK Department of Health's Five 80g Servings of Vegetables and Fruit A Day' recommendation) reduces the risks of developing these diseases significantly more, and ... In February 2017 a very large review and meta-analysis conducted by Dagfinn Aune and colleagues (which pooled and re-analysed the findings of 95 studies covering around two million people) 1 concluded that: eating 800g of F&V a day appeared to have reduced the risks by even more, viz: of developing heart disease by 24% of having a stroke by 33% of developing cardiovascular disease by 28% of...

Singly essential, doubly essential and triply essential fatty acids

For the last six months we have put in a lot of time learning everything there is to know about fatty acids.  Here is the first posting ...  Within the fields of academic biology, medicine and nutrition the adjective ‘essential’ is used in three different ways. There is the common usage of '‘must have’ or ‘cannot do without’ this or that nutrient if one wants to achieve good health. Many fatty acids are deemed 'essential ' or 'singly essential' in this sense. Academic biologists, doctors, researchers and nutritionists sometimes use the adjective 'essential' as a shorthand for 'this nutrient cannot be made by the human body'. There are two fatty acids considered 'doubly essential' - alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) and linoleic acid (LA) - in that: we cannot do without them if we want to achieve good health they cannot be made by the human body For many people the adjective 'essential' is also a synonym of the adjective 'p...